Question7: 
The Question is whether the Customs Officer are Proper Officer vested with power 
to adjudicate the (i) value (ii) classification (iii) refund (iv) other matters 
relating to the dispute with regard to IGST. The customs officer is vested with 
power to levy and collect IGST. There is always a dispute as to what should the 
value of import goods or where the goods are correctly classifiable ? 
2  The IGST collected is immediately reflected in the GST portal. There is no 
procedure under Customs Act 1962 whereby the importer can get the refund of IGST.
3  If the officer of Customs Act 1962 are vested with adjudication than the who 
is the Appellate authority. Under IGST only Additional Commissioner can 
adjudicate whereas under Customs Act 1962 Commissioner can adjudicate.
4  This is most important question with regard to the jurisdiction of the 
Officer of Customs with regard to IGST.  
5  Please understand that IGST is not a countervailing duty like CVD and SAD 
which was levied under the Customs Act 1962.
6  The operation of Customs Assessment are partially computer and partially 
manual whereas the IGST is fully computerized and system based. These basic 
issues have not been addressed so far. Waiting for some one to challenge in HC 
so that they can decide the jurisdiction aspect. 
Answer: 
We happily answer your supplementary quarries. Quarry wise reply is as under;
Q. No. 1 - In case of import of goods, the assessing Customs officer at the port 
of import assesses value and decides classification of imported goods under 
Customs Tariff Act, 1975/Customs Act, 1962. As per the assessment made under the 
provisions of the said Acts, the Basic Customs duty and all other relevant taxes 
are collected. Integrated tax on imported goods is levied and collected on the 
value determined under the provisions of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with 
Section 12 of Customs Act, 1962. Section 5 of IGST Act, 2017 empowers the 
Customs officer to levy and collect integrated tax in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 3 of Customs tariff Act, 1975 at the point when Customs 
duty is levied and collected. Section 5 of IGST Act, 2017 is reproduced below 
for your convenience.
 Section 5: Levy and collection.
(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax 
called the integrated goods and services tax on all inter-State supplies of 
goods or services or both; except on the supply of alcoholic liquor for human 
consumption, on the value determined under section 15 of the Central Goods and 
Services Tax Act and at such rates, not exceeding forty per cent., as may be 
notified by the Government on the recommendations of the Council and collected 
in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be paid by the taxable person: 
Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied 
and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs 
Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when 
duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs 
Act, 1962. Classification of goods under GST is determined as given under 
Schedules - I to VI of Notification No. 01/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. 
Further explanation (iv) appended to the said Notification No. 01/2017-CT (Rate) 
dated 28.06.2017 clarifies that Section and Chapter Notes and the General 
explanatory Notes of First schedule to the Customs tariff Act, 1975 will apply 
for interpretation of the above said Notification. The said explanation is 
reproduced below; 
(iv) The rules for the interpretation of the First Schedule to the Customs 
Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), including the Section and Chapter Notes and the 
General Explanatory Notes of the First Schedule shall, so far as may be, apply 
to the interpretation of this notification. In case of disputes relating 
classification or valuation, the aggrieved party has the option to file appeal 
before the relevant Appellate Authority i.e. Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) 
being first appellate authority, Tribunal and finally before the Apex Court. In 
other words, disputes, if any, can be resolved by way of filing appeals only. 
There cannot be a dispute of jurisdiction, as has been conceived by learned 
client. For imported goods, relevant Customs officer is the only authority to 
make assessment. CGST or SGST authorities cannot make their own assessments. 
They have to resort to filing of appeals if they dispute assessment made by 
Customs officer.  
Q. No. 2 -  After the dispute relating Customs duty/IGST is resolved through 
Appellate Forums, refund of excess taxes charged will have to be made by Customs 
authorities only as was being done in case of refund of SAD. Refund of SAD was 
being done by Customs authorities only though the said tax pertained to VAT. It 
is emphasized here that if value is challenged, all the taxes charged are going 
to be impacted and refunds, if any, would also impact all the taxes charged. 
Q No. 3 & 4- The first appeal as discussed above would lie before Commissioner 
of Customs (Appeals) and not before any other Appellate authority. Commissioner 
(Appeals) of CGST/SGST does not have any jurisdiction in such matters. 
Q. No. 5 - IGST charged on imported goods is sum total of erstwhile CVD and SAD. 
The said taxes have been subsumed into IGST, hence, disputes relating imported 
goods will have to be resolved in the manner discussed above. 
Q. No. 6 - This matter does not have any relevance with the erstwhile or 
existing laws. Enforcement of law can be made manually or through electronic 
technology as per the convenience of the Government. However, working of Customs 
is fully computerized since long in most of the Commission orates. All the 
information's relating imports/exports can be tracked on ICEGATE portal of 
Customs. Even filing of Shipping Bill/Bill of Entry can be done from home of the 
exporter/importer. Only examination of consignments is being done manually. It 
is hoped that all your concerns have been fully addressed. Please feel free to 
make any further quarry. (Reply dt. 11/11/2017)